- —One prompt, one answer — whatever the model leans toward.
- —No friction: it never argues with its own first take.
- —You get a summary, not a stress test.
- —The bear case shows up only if you remember to ask.
Six specialist agents analyse the same stock independently, disagree with each other — and hand you a brief that has already been cross-checked internally before you ever see it. In 60–100 seconds.
Six tabs open. The earnings transcript. Two Reddit threads that contradict each other. A bull case that sounds airtight — until you remember you only went looking for reasons to agree with yourself. So you decide anyway, on a feeling, and spend the next three weeks wondering what you missed.
That’s not a discipline problem. It’s an infrastructure problem. One person, reading in one direction, can’t hold six perspectives at once.
Almost every AI research tool is a better search engine. You ask, one model answers, and you get a single confident opinion. The Committee Method works the opposite way: six specialist agents receive the same task, analyse it independently, and argue their reads against each other — so what reaches you is a position that has already survived its own internal disagreement.
Like putting six specialist analysts in one room — instead of asking a single generalist and hoping they thought of everything.
What used to take you 3–4 hours of switching between tabs, the committee does in one pass — every angle at once, nothing skipped. You stay in control. You make the call.
Enter a supported stock or pick a curated theme. That's the whole input. No setup, no prompt engineering, no dashboards to configure.
Macro, Sector, Momentum, Fundamental, Catalyst and Risk run in parallel — each reaching its own read, then arguing it against the others. Disagreement is the point.
You get one consolidated research brief — the six views, where they conflict, and the risks up-front. Cross-checked before you see it. You make the call.
Each agent gets the same stock and one job. When they all agree, you have a clear picture. When they disagree — and they will — you see exactly what to look into before you commit a cent.
Argues the other side on purpose — overvaluation, debt, competition, volatility — and stays on screen so the bear case never disappears.
Reads whether the broad environment — rates, inflation, growth — is a tailwind or a headwind for this name right now.
Judges whether the company’s industry is gaining or losing ground, and where capital is rotating to.
Reads price direction and volume to tell you what the market is actually doing with the stock — not what it should be doing.
Checks whether the business underneath the ticker is healthy — revenue, margins and cash flow, not the narrative.
Flags what is coming that could move the stock — earnings, launches, regulatory decisions — so timing is never a surprise.
We’re pre-launch, so we won’t hand you testimonials we don’t have yet. Instead, here is the exact structure of every committee result — one candidate, six views, risks up-front. Explore the three tabs. The brief is the proof.
Moderate divergence — Risk Agent flags valuation pressure while Momentum and Sector remain constructive. Worth a manual read before committing.
We won’t fake social proof we haven’t earned. Instead: a transparent process, founders who built this for themselves first, and data you can trace.
Nothing is hidden behind a black box. The Fundamental Agent reads the balance sheet and forms a view; the Momentum Agent pushes back from the chart. That tension is shown on screen, not averaged away. Trust through transparency, not testimonials.
We built AlphaLab because we kept losing evenings to the same six-tab research scramble — and never felt sure at the end. It is the tool we wanted for our own decisions before it was a product for yours.
Every brief is built on real market data, not vibes. Where a number cannot be sourced, the brief shows “—” rather than inventing one. We report process metrics — never return promises, which we will not and legally cannot make.
AlphaLab holds no positions, touches no brokerage, and executes nothing. Zero incentive to push you in any direction. It organises the evidence — the decision, and the judgement, stay entirely yours.
If you’re a serious investor, you’ve already thought of the catch. Here are the five we hear most — answered straight, before we ever talk price.
→The problem with AI research isn’t the technology — it’s the single-perspective structure. One prompt gives you one opinion. The committee forces structured dissent: the Momentum Agent contradicts the Fundamental Agent, the Risk Agent interrogates the Catalyst Agent. What comes out isn’t an optimistic write-up — it’s a brief that also tells you what argues against your thesis. Like a good analyst would.
→AlphaLab doesn’t replace a three-week due-diligence process on an acquisition. It delivers the structured overview you used to assemble yourself in 3–4 hours — Macro, Sector, Momentum, Fundamental, Catalyst and Risk, at once and consolidated. That’s the difference between a meeting briefing and an annual report. Both have their place.
→Good — you shouldn’t hand the decision to anything. AlphaLab gives no buy or sell recommendations and makes no return promises. It delivers a structured analytical frame; what you do with it is your call. Your judgement stays in charge. AlphaLab just gives it a better starting point.
→Almost every AI research tool is a better search engine: you ask, a model answers. AlphaLab has a different architecture. Six specialist agents get the same task, analyse independently, and argue their reads. The result isn’t an averaged output — it’s a brief that was cross-checked internally before you ever saw it.
→That’s exactly how founding access is built. You can request a full research brief before you decide anything. If it doesn’t convince you, the only thing you’ve spent is 90 seconds — not a cent, and not your trust.
The price goes up at full launch. The first 500 members lock in their rate permanently — no exceptions, no expiry — and their feedback directly shapes how the agents evolve.
Free during beta. Paid plan required at launch.
Why limited to 500: we’re opening founding access because we need real feedback from serious investors — not survey data. In return, we freeze your price for good. That’s the trade.
No more 1 a.m. doubt. No more wondering what you skipped. You open the brief, you see where the six agents agree and where they fight, you read the risks they put up-front — and then you decide, clear-eyed, in your own judgement.
Founding access is capped at 500. The price rises at full launch — your founding rate never does.
Research support only. No financial advice. No buy or sell signals. You decide.